Tuesday, December 8, 2009

well... huh.

Okay. I guess business picked up.

I still say we pick up Damon to DH and rotate in the OF.

Jeter SS
Damon DH
Teixeria 1B
Rodriguez 3B
Posada C
Cano 2B
Swisher RF
Gardner LF
Granderson CF

... really? And - how does this... or does this... affect trading for Doc?
hmmmm. Giving up AJax, Coke, and Ian... good for the long-term? I'd have to say for Ian - yes. As Bryan Hoch tweeted earlier today, he's slipped on their depth chart. Coke could be an anomaly (and, just as importantly, may NOT be). We'll see what A-Jax does.

All in all, I like it. I like Granderson's bat, I like his overall defense, and almost most of all... I like his attitude. He's a positive guy, which only helps the synergy.

(I just used "synergy" to describe a professional baseball team. Unbelievable.)

Saturday, December 5, 2009

The Quest for #28: 2010 Utopian Line-Up

... well, like most of the pundits have already claimed, I don't think there's much tinkering to do with the team. How can there be after the previous year brought home a world championship? But, alas - free agents, arbitration, and injuries. Oh, my.

It's disappointing to presume that Wang won't be back. He's an enigma of sorts - winning 19 games two years in a row, and then getting bit by the injury bug the last couple of years. I really do think that the start of 2009 for him was more mental than physical, with mechanics and just psyche fostering doubt. Hopefully, he rebounds in a good way for another club. From what I understand, he's a nice guy and a respectful teammate. This fan wishes him the best of luck.

To get Doc, we'll need to give up a considerable amount of value. But - as Buster Olney reported in his Thursday blog - now might be the best time to get return off of either Joba and / or Hughes. (I neither think nor believe the club would allow both to go in a trade.)

Jobamania seems to come in short bursts - I've waffled long enough on whether he's a starter or a reliever. I'm beginning to fall on the side of the latter. He seems to thrive on emotion, yet he is able to utilize that emotion to his advantage in the late innings and dial it up when it matters most. He got into a groove at some point in the season of pulling an "A.J." - pitching effectively overall but giving up 2-5 runs in one inning. This postseason, I think his true colors shown more vividly. Allow him the chance to take the torch from Mo now. See if he has the moxie.

Hughes should still be a starter. He filled the role this year well of late-inning reliever, but he seems more composed on the mound for the long haul. I think he has the work ethic to further develop his array of pitches as well. He may not become an ace - but he could be a solid #2 / #3 guy if he continues to build his abilities. And - as Burnett and even CC get older, he may prove to be valuable.

So - presuming one will have to go to get Halladay - I would ultimately say Joba, as unfortunate as that may be. His postseason performance give him a slightly larger upside than Hughes, I think - and from my projection of him now, he's slightly more expendable. (What if he doesn't become Mo 2.0? The other end of the spectrum is Farnsworth 2.0.)

We get Halladay. We don't need the other Holliday, or Bay (for that matter). That being said, the Melky / Gardner experiment will not work this time 'round. They respectfully fought for the CF position to start the year, and - fortunate for some bad luck - Brett broke his hand. So the competition naturally was settled. Barring another injury, I think both guys will wear thin going through another year of having to prove something to the team. In the end, if Girardi does that again... I don't see it having a long-term positive effect with either guy. And, with AJax in the wings - isn't it a matter of time before one of them just wants out altogether and stops playing with determination and passion?

I'm not sure about Johnny, either. I love his experience. I love his stature. I love his enthusiasm and generally disposition within the team. He started the loosening up process, allowing Melky and Robbie to jump up in the air... for mob scenes at home plate, where the goal became the player's HELMET and not the player himself... and for the notorious pie-in-the-face to become welcome. He's also got one of the weakest arms in the league. Opposing players test this, and almost dare him to do something about it. His defensive liability is growing, I think. And it may start to impact his offensive potential and clubhouse position.

Ah... whatever. If he wants to come back for two years... so be it. For the short-term, the team can handle him in left field.

I can go on and on - resigning Matsui? Andy? - but let's just assume that #55 stays (he's the best DH on the market, isn't he?), and we bring back Pettitte. (Which seems to be "Favre Lite," in some respects. I adore Andy Pettitte and what he has brought to the team that I love. It gives me the comfortability to kid with him about this. Along with conditioning, he seemed to have picked up the art of retiring from Roger, too.)

Okay... the line-up:

Jeter SS
Damon LF
Teixeria 1B
Rodriguez 3B
Posada C
Matsui DH
Cano 2B
Swisher RF
Gardner CF

(I like Brett's speed - offensively on the bases and defensively in the field - over Melky's. Generally speaking.)

Rotation:

Sabathia LHP
Halladay RHP
Pettitte LHP
Burnett RHP
Hughes RHP

I'll get to the bullpen later.
Oh - and, if we get greedy and get Lackey... that's not the worst thing in the world. But I think that all but ruins Phil's evolution.

Go Yanks. I love listening to Ol' Blue Eyes now. Reminds me of a month ago...
:)

Friday, December 4, 2009

I just want it known... here and now...

... that I've never been more wrong in my life, from what I wrote in the last post.

And I couldn't be happier in being utterly and completely wrong.
New York Yankees: 2009. World. Champions.

YES! The quest for 27 is complete.
Done and done. Congratulations, boys. Well done.

(deep breath)... okay... let's go get #28.
:)

Saturday, May 9, 2009

30 Games In

What drives me nuts on this team thus far is the lack of timely hitting. We have guys who can supposedly mash, but what about a shot in the gap with two outs and runners on first and second? It really seems like we're just either hitting singles or home runs. Every so often, we'll get a double. (Posada had two games of getting RBI doubles; I remember this distinctly. That speaks to my point.)

Tonight, we've gotten two solo shots, and one two-run HR. We still maintain relative patience at the plate, but choose to swing away too quickly. Tex just grounded out to the second baseman on a 2-0 count. We can see pitchers struggling, but we tend to jump on him to try and deliver the knockout punch. Instead, we calm him down when we just ground / fly out.

What I like is our chemistry. I'm reading all around that the team likes each other; I wonder how Alex will affect that. I agree with Pete Abraham - if this team gets healthy, and finds a groove to where it's playing effectively (offensively, defensively, pitching), it can do damage. But with this suddenly old team, that may seem to be asking for too many stars to align properly.

I'm not sure I quite understand Girardi's moves, but he knows the team better than I. I can appreciate the choice NOT to bring a long reliever out of Spring Training, based on how the team played. Wang threw that out of whack from the onset.

Something else, and this is serious: Boston is in their heads. I don't think that will change until the seniors on the team (Jeter, Posada, Pettite, and definitely Rivera) are gone. Maybe even Alex. 2004 still just resonates with this franchise too much. That - in conjunction with age and attrition - just hurts too much.

We're one game below .500, and losing by six runs to the last place team in the division. Something tells me, already at this point, this is what we're going to be facing for the year. I strongly hope that I am wrong.

Thursday, December 25, 2008

okay - let's tease fate a little here.

so - I did this on Monday night, and Teixeria signed the next day.  After thinking about the line-up and rotation a little more - and getting all the more greedy, I will readily and steadily admit - here's what I'm thinking the club could still do, in an ideal and utopian world:

* Trade Matsui to SF for left-hand reliever and general prospects
* Trade Melky and Ian Kennedy to SD for Peavy
* Sign Manny to 1-year, $24 million

Those three items completed, here's the line-up and rotation for Opening Day:

Damon LF
Jeter SS
Rodriguez 3B
Teixeria 1B
Ramirez DH
Posada C
Cano 2B
Nady RF
Gardner CF

Sabathia  LHP
Peavy  RHP
Wang  RHP
Burnett  RHP
Hughes  RHP

Joba goes back into set-up mode for Mo.  Bullpen can be Marte, Bruney, Veras, Ramirez, Coke.  Swisher, Molina, and Ransom are on the bench.

Honestly?  That just flat out scares me.  Can you see that rotation in pinstripes?  That line-up? Manny hitting FIFTH?  Seriously, if you were Manny - wouldn't you call up Boras and say - "You know what, I want to go there just to see what it would be like for one year.  I'll be good for one year - we'll win a title - and I'll play the market again next year.  See if there are any takers."

The trade for Peavy won't happen - but gosh - wouldn't that be fun.  Peavy throwing the day after Sabathia?  I only put Burnett as #4 because I would like to mix it up with Wang throwing ground outs in between.  And why not Hughes?  I read somewhere that any of the other teams would gladly take him off the Yankees hands - an ace in the waiting.  Well, what better way to shelter him here than to put him in at #5... with that everyday row of excellent hitters? Goodness gracious.

Sure - Gardner at CF isn't a run-producer.  But the same type of logic applies as with Hughes - how could he NOT build confidence hitting in this line-up?  And his defense will more than make-up for any oh-fer's.

I just scrolled back up, and looked at that line-up again.  And then the rotation.  And then I grinned.  Big grin.  Like, holy-cow-YES-will-be-my-obsession-next-year grin.

What would that be on the field - chemistry-wise... TEAM-wise?  Don't know.  But I would be MORE than willing to find out, as a fan of this club.

Heh.  I just grinned again.  Merry Christmas, everyone.

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

uh...

... well, who would've known that they would actually get Teixeira.  We're one step closer.  I don't think we NEED to go get Manny now - but talk about what kind of an icing that would be.

hmmm... what to do now?  Trade Matsui?  I like the youth and the energy that Nady brings.  I like Swisher, too.  Damon will have his moments, but I wonder if he'll consistently provide his offense like he did three, four years ago.  Hmmm... and then there's Posada, but Sherman with the Post is claiming that we picked up Kevin Cash on a minor-league contract.

frankly, I wonder what kind of a TEAM this will bring.  Adding Sabathia will foster the team - adding Burnett or Teixeira appear to be more business-types.  Hmmm...

... questions still abound.  And I like this signing.  But one of the bigger questions: is Teixeira another eight years of Giambi Lite?  Nah - couldn't be, could it?

... questions still abound.  But, today - I'm excited.  I'll let the honeymoon keep for the next couple of days.

Monday, December 22, 2008

the quest for 27 - 2009 Utopian Line-Up

I just wanted to write down this line-up.  I know it can't happen; I'm thinking ideally on this, outside of Tex's soon-to-be nine figure deal and Manny's nine year-old attitude, finding someone to take Matsui and his aging knees.  (Not that I think we should get rid of 55 - I've always highly respected both his work ethic and his loyalty to the team.  And I think it's safe to say the team appreciates that, too.)  

All that said - I cringe with adolescent delight at this Opening Day line-up in the new Stadium.

Damon LF
Jeter SS
Rodriguez 3B
Teixiera 1B
Ramirez DH
Cano 2B
Posada C
Nady RF
Gardner CF

Sabathia
Burnett
Wang
Chamberlain
Pettitte

What a scary line-up, and what an intimidating rotation, all the way around.  I don't know whether they win 100 games, but I like it on paper... knowing how all of them play individually.  Then you factor in how they would gel as a team... whether or not they'd be cohesive... Manny being... I can't serve that cliche one more time... and... well... I come back to reality.

But, man - what a line-up that would be, ideally.
All of that said - I like Swisher.  I even still like Melky.  I think they'll both serve the team well, in service and in character.  We'll see.